Sacred Silence, Sacred Safety: Why Children Must Have a Safe Place to Speak

School Board Statement On Student Safety, Free Speech, And Inclusive Education pdf.

Download • 24KB

There is a sacred truth that transcends politics, doctrine, and fear:

Children must be protected.

Not protected from who they are—but protected so they can safely discover who they are.

In our schools today, a small number of students—approximately 1% or less who may be transgender and about 10% who identify as LGBTQ+ overall—are being treated as if their existence itself is a threat. In reality, they are among the most vulnerable children in our care.

For these young people, silence is not neutrality. Silence can be dangerous.

A Safe Space Is Not a Luxury — It Is a Lifeline

For many children, school is the only place where:

• They are not yelled at

• They are not shamed

• They are not threatened

• They are not harmed for being honest

Some children live in homes shaped by extreme religious views, rigid dogma, or fear-based belief systems that teach them they are sinful, broken, or evil simply for existing as they are.

Others face the very real risk of:

• Emotional abuse

• Physical violence

• Forced “conversion” practices

• Homelessness

• Abandonment

For these children, disclosure is not rebellion. It is a cry for safety.

To deny them a confidential, judgment-free space to speak is not neutrality. It is neglect.

Why Confidentiality Saves Lives

Children do not withhold truth because they are deceitful. They withhold truth because they are afraid.

Afraid of:

• Being hit

• Being thrown out

• Being told God hates them

• Being punished for honesty

When a child tells a teacher or counselor, “I don’t feel safe telling my parents,” that statement must be taken seriously—the same way we would take it seriously if they disclosed physical abuse.

A school should never become an extension of fear.

A school must be a refuge.

Education Without Safety Is Incomplete

Schools exist not only to teach math, reading, and science—but to uphold the basic dignity of every child.

A truly safe school:

• Protects children from harm at school

• Does not knowingly send them back into danger

• Honors emotional and psychological safety as much as academic success

When we force a child to be “outed” against their will, knowing that harm may follow, we are complicit in that harm.

That is not parental love. That is not faith. That is not protection.

When Love Is Absent, Protection Must Step In

This is a hard truth, but a necessary one:

Parents do not have the right to abuse their children.

If a parent cannot love, accept, and support their child’s gender identity or sexual orientation—if that rejection results in harm—then intervention is not cruelty.

It is mercy.

Children who are unsafe at home should be placed with:

• Loving, affirming foster families

• Guardians who protect rather than punish

• Homes where their identity is not a battleground

Love is not proven by control. Love is proven by care.

This Is a Spiritual Issue

Across every faith tradition, there is a shared moral truth:

Protect the innocent. Shelter the vulnerable. Do no harm.

Any belief system that demands a child suffer for “purity,” obedience, or doctrine has lost its moral center.

Spirituality without compassion is not holy. Faith without love is empty.

A Prayer for Our Children

Divine Source of Love, Guardian of the small and the scared, We place into Your care every child who hides their truth out of fear.

Wrap them in safety where homes have failed them. Send protectors where love has been withheld. Soften hearts hardened by doctrine and fear.

Bless our schools to be sanctuaries, Our teachers to be safe witnesses, Our counselors to be gentle keepers of trust.

May no child be punished for honesty. May no child be harmed for being who they are. May love be louder than fear.

Amen.

A Final Truth

Protecting children is not radical. Creating safe spaces is not indoctrination. Listening without judgment is not rebellion.

It is our sacred duty.

If we fail the smallest among us, we fail the very future we claim to protect.

Representation Is Not an Agenda — Erasure Is Abuse

It is not only harmful—it is offensive and abusive—to deny children access to literature, media, stories, and educational experiences that represent all people.

To include an LGBTQ+ character in a book, a play, a musical, or a lesson is not pushing an agenda. It is simply telling the truth about the world as it exists.

Children already live in a diverse world. They go to school with LGBTQ classmates. They have LGBTQ family members. They see LGBTQ people in their communities. Representation does not create identity—it acknowledges reality.

The purpose of education is not to preserve comfort. The purpose of education is to teach truth, context, and humanity.

This Is How History Is Taught — Or Should Be

We teach about:

• The Civil War

• The genocide of Indigenous peoples

• The Trail of Tears

• Slavery

• Women’s suffrage

• The fact that women were once considered property, unable to vote, own land, or live independently without a husband

We teach about:

• The Spanish Inquisition

• The Holocaust

• Genocides across history

And when children ask:

“Why were Jewish people killed? ”Why were LGBTQ people targeted? ”Why were certain groups erased or punished for who they were?”

The answer cannot be silence.

To refuse to teach about LGBTQ people is no different than refusing to teach about:

• Women’s rights

• Racial injustice

• Religious persecution

Erasure is not protection. Erasure is indoctrination.

Who Decides Which Lives Are Allowed to Be Seen?

Some parents argue that they do not want their children “influenced” by what they call woke or leftist ideas.

Yet these same arguments are often used to:

• Deny that racism still exists

• Minimize or deny slavery

• Question whether the Holocaust really happened

• Reject historical facts that challenge their worldview

This is not neutrality. This is selective truth.

Even more concerning, these same voices often attempt to impose a religious worldview—specifically a narrow, white evangelical, extremist version of Christianity—onto all students, regardless of their faith, culture, or family beliefs.

That is not religious freedom. That is a violation of religious freedom.

Christian Nationalism Is Not Christianity

When one religion is elevated above all others by the state, we do not have freedom.

We have a theocracy.

Christian nationalism does not lead to democracy. It leads to:

• Authoritarian control

• Suppression of dissent

• Punishment of difference

• Loss of free speech

• Loss of freedom of religion

History shows us this clearly.

A nation governed by one enforced religious ideology is not a free republic. It becomes a totalitarian regime, no different in structure—though perhaps different in language—from systems we see in places like Russia, China, or North Korea.

When the state decides which beliefs are “correct, "freedom no longer exists.

Why Culture Wars Are Being Weaponized

What is happening now is not accidental.

Culture wars are used to:

• Divide communities

• Distract the public

• Turn parents against teachers

• Turn neighbors against neighbors

While people argue over books, pronouns, and curriculum, economic power continues to concentrate in the hands of the wealthiest 1% and major corporations.

The real agenda is not about protecting children. It is about maintaining control.

When people are divided by fear, they are easier to govern. When people are distracted by moral panic, they are easier to exploit.

Truth Is Not Radical — It Is Sacred

Teaching children the truth about history, humanity, and diversity is not radicalization.

It is education.

Allowing children to see themselves—and others—reflected in stories is not harmful.

It is healing.

And protecting children from shame, erasure, and ideological coercion is not political.

It is a moral and spiritual obligation.

Legal Foundations That Protect Children, Free Speech, and Education

Public education in the United States is more than a delivery system for facts — it is a civil right grounded in constitutional law and democratic values. A free and inclusive education depends on protected speech, non-discrimination, and access to ideas.

1. The First Amendment — Free Speech and the Right to Receive Information

The First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects freedom of speech, expression, and the press, not only for adults but for children and students in public education. This includes the right to access diverse ideas and viewpoints through books, curriculum, and classroom discussion.

• The First Amendment prevents government (including public school boards) from abridging speech based on viewpoint — meaning books and materials may not be removed simply because their ideas are controversial or unpopular. This is known as viewpoint discrimination, and when it occurs in public schools, it can violate students’ constitutional rights to receive information and ideas. American Library Association+1

• U.S. courts have repeatedly affirmed that students and teachers retain free speech rights at school, and that these rights include the ability to explore a wide range of topics in classroom and library settings. National Coalition Against Censorship

📌 Students have a right to think critically, express their beliefs, and engage with diverse perspectives — essential ingredients for an educated, thoughtful citizenry. National Coalition Against Censorship

2. Free Expression in Student Media

Some states go even further to ensure student speech rights. For example:

• California Education Code §48907 explicitly protects student expression in school newspapers and publications, affirming that schools cannot censor student voices simply because they present controversial ideas. Wikipedia

This demonstrates how states can enact stronger protections to ensure students are not silenced in school environments.

3. Laws That Have Led to Book Bans and Restrictions

Despite constitutional protections, recent state laws have spurred dramatic increases in book challenges, restrictions, and removal from school libraries and classrooms:

• Since 2021, thousands of books — including titles featuring LGBTQ+, racial justice, and diverse perspectives — have been removed or challenged due to new legislation and policies. Many of these laws are justified under broad “parents’ rights” or content-restriction mandates. PEN America+1

• For example, Iowa Senate File 496 (2023) sought to prohibit books depicting gender identity and sexual orientation in school libraries and classrooms. Portions of the law banning such books were later blocked by a federal judge due to its overly broad censorship effects, including restricting classic literature that contains non-explicit content. Wikipedia

These laws often frame themselves as protecting children, but their real effect has been to erase voices and limit access to ideas, disproportionately silencing historically marginalized students and authors.

4. Constitutional Debate Over Book Bans

Legal scholars have emphasized that book bans and censorship raise significant First Amendment issues:

• Removing books because of the ideas contained within can violate students’ rights to receive information and pursue knowledge. Freedom Forum

• Supreme Court precedent has held that public school boards may not remove books simply because they dislike the viewpoints expressed. Coastal Libraries

Even when courts disagree about the contours of these protections, the fundamental legal principle is that government censorship on the basis of viewpoint is highly suspect and often unconstitutional. Virginia Mercury

5. Recent Court Rulings — Balancing Rights and Protections

The legal landscape continues to evolve:

• In Mahmoud v. Taylor (2025), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that parents have a right to advance notice and opt out of LGBTQ-inclusive storybooks on religious grounds, highlighting the Court’s effort to balance free exercise of religion with public education authority. Supreme Court+1

These rulings illustrate why policies must be written carefully — protecting both students’ rights to education and families’ religious freedoms — without creating unsafe environments for vulnerable youth.

Why These Legal Protections Matter for Schools

Access to a full range of ideas and stories is essential for education. A curriculum that excludes diverse human experiences — especially those of LGBTQ+ people, people of color, and historically marginalized groups — fails to prepare students for civic life and critical thinking.

When laws or policies censor books or restrict teaching about real lived experience, the result is:

✔️ Erosion of academic freedom✔️ Limitation of free expression and thought✔️ Denial of representation for vulnerable students✔️ Creation of educational silos instead of inclusive learning communities✔️ Undermining of students’ ability to engage with the world as it is

Policy Intent — Protect Free Speech & Inclusive Education

Students must be guaranteed:

📌 The right to access books and materials that reflect the diversity of the world — including LGBTQ+ voices and perspectives.📌 Curricula that are age-appropriate, fact-based, and inclusive of historically accurate human experience.📌 Protection from censorship that erases history, identity, or lived experience in the name of ideology or politics.📌 Respect for their First Amendment rights to receive information, express ideas, and learn in a free and democratic educational environment.

A Call to Action for School Boards and Educators

In accordance with constitutional principles and the moral duty to protect all students, we therefore affirm:

Educational institutions must resist censorship and ensure access to diverse ideas, while also recognizing the rights of families and the importance of supporting all students — including the most vulnerable.

Protecting free speech and educational integrity is not partisan — it is foundational to a democratic society and the moral obligation of every school system.

Statement on Student Safety, Free Speech, and Inclusive Education

Submitted to: Local School Boards, K–12 Districts, Colleges and Universities, and Departments of Education

Date: January 9, 2026

Purpose

This statement affirms the responsibility of educational institutions to provide safe, inclusive, truthful, and non-discriminatory learning environments for all students, grounded in constitutional principles, child-protection ethics, and educational integrity.

I. Schools Are Institutions of Education and Safety

Educational institutions exist not only to transmit academic knowledge, but to ensure the physical, emotional, psychological, and moral safety of the students entrusted to their care.

A school that educates without protecting students from harm is failing its fundamental mission.

All students—regardless of race, religion, gender identity, sexual orientation, disability, or family background—are entitled to a safe learning environment, freedom from discrimination and harassment, access to truthful and age-appropriate education, and the ability to seek support without fear of retaliation or abuse.

II. Representation Is Not an Agenda — It Is Educational Integrity

It is offensive and abusive to deny children access to literature, curriculum, media, and educational experiences that represent the full diversity of humanity.

The inclusion of LGBTQ+ individuals and stories in books, plays, films, music, history lessons, and coursework is not indoctrination. It is an accurate reflection of the world as it exists.

Representation does not create identity. It acknowledges reality.

Teaching about LGBTQ+ people is no different from teaching about women’s suffrage, the Civil War, Indigenous history and the Trail of Tears, slavery and segregation, the Holocaust, or the Spanish Inquisition. Denying instruction about LGBTQ+ people constitutes educational erasure.

III. Erasure and Forced Silence Cause Harm

When students are denied representation, language, and safe spaces to communicate, harm occurs. Isolation increases, mental health risks rise, and abuse and neglect may go undetected.

This is particularly dangerous for students who fear rejection, emotional abuse, physical violence, religious coercion, or loss of housing if their identity is disclosed.

Educational institutions must never knowingly place students at risk by enforcing silence or denying safe avenues of support.

IV. Confidentiality and Student Safety

Students must have access to confidential, non-judgmental support from counselors, educators, and student services, especially when disclosure to family members may result in harm.

Ethical child-safety standards require that student well-being be prioritized above ideology or political pressure. Outing students against their will places vulnerable youth in danger and violates established safeguarding principles.

V. Free Speech, Free Inquiry, and the Law

The First Amendment protects freedom of speech, expression, and the right to receive information. Public educational institutions may not engage in viewpoint discrimination by removing books or restricting curriculum solely because ideas are controversial or unpopular.

Recent legislation and policies have led to widespread book bans and curriculum restrictions, disproportionately targeting LGBTQ+ voices and marginalized communities. These actions undermine academic freedom, erode educational integrity, and create unsafe learning environments.

A well-educated public requires access to diverse ideas, historical truth, and lived experience. Censorship weakens democracy.

VI. Education Must Remain Free from Religious or Ideological Imposition

Public education must respect freedom of religion, freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, and the constitutional separation of church and state.

No single religious or ideological worldview may be imposed upon students, educators, or institutions. Education must remain pluralistic, inclusive, and grounded in democratic principles.

VII. Statement of Commitment

We call upon all educational institutions and governing bodies to:

1. Protect student safety above ideology

2. Provide inclusive, fact-based education

3. Ensure access to representation and truthful history

4. Preserve confidentiality where student safety is at risk

5. Reject censorship that erases marginalized people

6. Uphold constitutional freedoms and pluralism

7. Act in the best interest of all students, especially the most vulnerable

   
   

Conclusion

A society is judged by how it treats its children.

Schools must be places of learning and refuge, where truth is taught, dignity is upheld, and every student is protected from harm.

Anything less is a failure of education—and a failure of conscience.

Respectfully submitted,

Rev. Paula Josephine Sadler Founder & Spiritual Leader Universal Rainbow Faith Las Vegas, Nevada🌐 https://www.universalrainbowfaith.org📧 contact@universalrainbowfaith.org